Differences Between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0

There are three categories of Web, namely Web 1.0, Web 2.0, and Web 3.0. Let’s try to understand their basic differences. Web 1.0 refers to connecting information and shared read-write hypertext space, while Web 2.0 is known as the participative Web, as it allows users to connect via social networking with more interaction with less control.

web 2.0

Web 3.0 refers to connecting intelligence and is known as Semantic Web; in other words, it identifies Web-based data so that searches can be more effective, and the information is part of the network. Web 3.0 is considering the future of every sector, including business.

This article covers many topics in relation to the journey of Web 1.0 to Web 3.0, particularly Web and business models, Web applications, social networking sites, the Web, technology, and social influence, and the Web and education.

What is Web 2.0?

Web 2.0 is a buzzword commonly used to embrace diverse and novel processes on the World Wide Web. Even though predominately a marketing term, some of the key imputes colligated with Web 2.0 include the emergence of social networks, two-way communication, various ‘glue’ techniques and substantial multifariousness in content types.

Although most of Web 2.0 runs on the same platform as 1.0, there are some fundamental divergences. We aim to key out the primary differences leading to the properties of interest in 2.0 to be characterised.

Web 2.0 enamours a combination of conceptions on the Web in recent years. The accurate definition is subtle, and it is hard to categorise with the binary label “Web 1.0” or “Web 2.0”. But there is an uncluttered separation between a set of prevalent Web 2.0 sites such as Facebook and YouTube and the old Web. These departures are seeable when contrived onto a variety of axes, such as technological structural and sociological.

It is ultimately about harnessing network effects and collective intelligence of the users to build applications that literally get better the more people use them.

Differences between web 1.0 and web 2.0

One of the significant differences between Web 1.0 and Web 2.0 is that the content creators were very few in Web 1.0 with the sheer majority of users merely served as consumers of content, while any user can be a content generator in Web 2.0 and various technical assistance have been added to increase the potential for content generation.

Another difference between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 can be based on time. The term “Web 2.0” was invented around 2004, and many of the first genuine Web 2.0 sites started progressing in late 2003 and early 2004. The websites which have modified a little in structure since the early 2000s and before may be counted as Web 1.0 (such as IMDB).

A key feature in Web 2.0 is that these sites boost users to expend as much time as possible on their site. They offer strong inducements for increasing stickiness on the site. In Web 1.0 most websites have links to external sites and users can easily follow those links to other sites. The primary reason for this is that most of the Web 1.0 sites incline to cover a single topic and do not necessitate users to log in to access them. On the other hand, Web 2.0 sites encourage intra-site activities, usually requiring users to log in and build links to others on the site.

Web 1.0 sites were for one-way communication while Web 2.0 sites build two-way communication medium. Web 1.0 was autocratic and top-down. On the other hand, Web 2.0 is democratic and bottom-up. Rather than the New York Times 1.0 website stating you what the significant stories of the day were, Digg.com, Buzz and Yahoo.com depicts the stories users have voted the most crucial.

Web 1.0 sites were plain to be read passively. Web 2.0 sites stimulate participation, voting for the content up or down, grading it, remarking on it, and submitting new posts. By 2000, Amazon.com was allowing users to review books, but nowadays users can take part in many different ways like create lists of products, write product guides and edit wiki articles (Amapedia). In 2000, Amazon was utilising its sites to sell products it bought in. With Web 2.0, Amazon now lets you list and sell your own new and old books and products through their website.

Web 1.0 sites were static and seldom gets changed where Web 2.0 sites are dynamic and change hourly or even more frequently, pondering all of those user shares. Web 1.0 sites were closed up sites while Web 2.0 sites are collaborative sites.

Below table highlights the distinguishing features between Web 2.0 and Web 1.0 and compares how things have changed since the web culture has overturned.

Web 1.0

  • It was about reading
  • It was about companies
  • It was about client-server
  • It was about HTML
  • It was about home pages
  • It was about portals
  • It was about taxonomy
  • It was about wires
  • It was about owning
  • It was about IPO’s
  • It was about Netscape
  • It was about screen scraping
  • It was about web forms
  • It was about hardware costs
  • It was about dial-up
  • It was top-down
  • It was edited and produced
  • It was about banner ads

Web 2.0

  • It is about writing
  • It is about communities
  • It is about peer to peer
  • It is about XML
  • It is about blogs
  • It is about RSS
  • It is about tags
  • It is about wireless
  • It is about sharing
  • It is about trade sales
  • It is about Google
  • It is about APIs
  • It is about web applications
  • It is about bandwidth costs
  • It is about broadband
  • It is bottom-up
  • It is raw
  • It is about AdSense

Current and Future (Web 3.0)

Web 3.0, also known as the ‘Semantic Web’, is the third generation of the World Wide Web. Web 3.0 allows users to generate customized web content based on their profile and preferences. Web 3.0 relies heavily on user-generated data such as likes, shares, comments to create search algorithms for enhancing the user experience of the web.

Web 3.0 is heavily geared towards the design and development of business strategies and web applications for e-commerce and Big Data analytics. The social and semantic web together have em-powered the learners since learning now extends into a global classroom with virtual collaboration through the use of free and access to open

Facebook Comments

Show More

Leave a Reply

Back to top button