Due to security concerns, 55% of Kubernetes Adoption Slowing Down the App Development. Let’s discuss this in detail regarding the Application.
Three of the most frequently mentioned advantages of containerization include faster bug fixes, quicker release cycles, and better flexibility to operate and manage applications across hybrid environments. The biggest benefit of containerization—agility—may be lost if security is treated as an afterthought.
Over the past 12 months, the majority of survey participants (55%) have had to postpone an application release due to security concerns. Unexpected security issues are frequently brought on by new technology.
Security requirements that cover every stage of the application life cycle, from creation to deployment and maintenance, can overwhelm some enterprises.
They want a straightforward method to safeguard their containerized apps without complicating operations or delaying development.
In the last 12 months, 93% of Kubernetes settings encountered at least one security issue
This result is likely the result of a number of factors, such as a lack of security knowledge about containers and Kubernetes, insufficient or unsuitable security tooling, and central security teams that are unable to keep up with rapidly developing applications development teams that consider security to be an afterthought.
As a result, 31% of respondents claim to have lost money or clients as a result of a security event in the previous 12 months.
Why Is Kubernetes Adoption Slowing Down the App Development?
Data breaches continue to be mostly caused by human mistakes. According to a recent survey, human error contributed significantly to 95% of breaches. 1 Not unexpectedly, during the past 12 months, misconfiguration incidents have occurred in the settings of roughly 53% of respondents.
A DevSecOps programme is now active in 78%
The majority supports DevSecOps, which refers to the procedures and tools that enable security to be integrated into the life cycle of developing an application rather than being treated as a distinct activity.
The majority of responders to our poll reported that they are currently working on a DevSecOps effort, which is excellent news. Only 22% of respondents still run DevOps independently of security.
With an advanced DevSecOps strategy that integrates and automates security across the life cycle, 27% of respondents consider their firms to be among the most forward-thinking in terms of DevSecOps.
The biggest security worry is misconfiguration (46%)
With several configuration choices, Kubernetes is a highly flexible container orchestrator that has an impact on the security posture of an application.
As a result, respondents are almost three times as concerned about exposures caused by misconfigurations in their container and Kubernetes setups (46%) as they are about assaults (16%), with vulnerabilities coming in at a close second place (28%).
Automating configuration management as much as you can help the developer and DevOps teams configure containers and Kubernetes more securely by letting security tools, not people, supply the barriers.
The runtime stage of the container life cycle is what concerns 57% of people the most
Organizations are particularly concerned with the runtime phase of the container life cycle, commonly referred to as Day 2 operations or the post-deployment stage.
Given that a resounding majority of respondents cite misconfigurations as the main cause of security risk and that they occur more frequently than any other kind of security incident, this worry appears contradictory.
However, keep in mind that build or deploy stage security flaws, such as misconfiguration, typically lead to runtime security vulnerabilities.
Additionally, any detrimental effects of a security error during the build or deploy phases will probably not be felt until an application is running in production.
The runtime also makes an incident response, a crucial security component, more challenging. Finally, fixing security flaws that are found during use will probably cost more.
Together, these factors help to explain why runtime security concerns have increased.
Objections to the use of Kubernetes
Although Kubernetes offers excellent agility and eventually more economic value, adoption has been limited for a number of reasons. The main issue is operational—running and managing Kubernetes clusters at scale is currently quite challenging.
Running a few Kubernetes clusters in a test environment or for a small, specialised project is quite simple, but scaling hundreds or thousands of Kubernetes clusters is significantly trickier.
Further evidence that internal decision-making is a barrier to adoption may be found in the VMware survey results: A Kubernetes distribution is chosen by many teams, according to 83% of respondents, and 40% of them mentioned “a lack of internal alignment as a challenge when picking a Kubernetes distribution.”
Kubernetes has a challenging learning curve as well. An infrastructure-level technology like Kubernetes needs even more new skill sets than any other technology. Most IT professionals are still accustomed to deploying and running infrastructure and applications on conventional virtual machines.
Some people have had the chance to experiment with containers over the previous few years, but they haven’t had as much time to do so with Kubernetes especially, which is more advanced than traditional container technology.
VMs have been drastically altered by Kubernetes. An organisation must have enough employees, resources, expertise, and knowledge spread among several teams in order to utilise it in full production.
Due to the difficulty in creating this experience, so few businesses are using Kubernetes in large-scale deployments.
Without Going It Alone, Adopt Kubernetes
To benefit from such advantages, organisations have to think about utilising Kubernetes. However, it’s usually not a good idea to try to deploy and manage the technology on your own.
Organizations have the option of using a pre-built Kubernetes cloud. Currently, a number of Kubernetes distributions are accessible on the cloud.
Enterprises should pick a platform that is centrally coordinated expressly for running Kubernetes, is readily expandable, and fully supports the technology across different clouds and the edge.
With 96% of enterprises utilising or investigating Kubernetes, usage is still increasing. Despite its high acceptance rate, Kubernetes adoption still faces significant obstacles, such as a lack of internal talent. The use of Kubernetes may not be as obvious as it previously was since it is also getting increasingly integrated into other systems.
One area where Kubernetes is being used covertly is serverless computing, and this pattern is likely to persist. Maybe that’s the actual measure of success: when, like with Linux, more people are using the technology than ever before, yet it is being abstracted away by simpler, developer-friendly interfaces.