The current trend in education is to move away from traditional exams and instead have a continuous assessment over the school year. What do you think of this trend?
The contemporary system of imparting literary skills is now shifting to regular assessments rather than conducting examinations. In my view, there are several flaws with this approach of evaluation of students’ academic progress.
First of all, in the continuous assessment system, the learning periods or spans are too short. For example, in most colleges and universities in English speaking country, there is a system of twelve-week of the semester. Within those twelve weeks, students are expected to learn the skills and concepts and apply them in their assessments. It is worth noting that not everyone is a fast-paced learner. Some students will not be able to cope up with learning and applications at the same time. Thus, this system of evaluation is going to help only students who are quick learners and hard-workers. Students who procrastinate may not be the real beneficiary of this innovative assessment technique.
On the other hand, there are also some benefits of continuous assessment procedure of evaluation. Regular assessments help educators to track the progress of pupils and if someone is showing weakness or lag in the study, they can devise some personalised solutions for such weak students. This approach is much better than waiting for a whole year for term-end examinations. Moreover, students will not be stressed during the last days prior to the exam if they have already learnt and understood concepts following the continuous assessment.
To sum up, the approach to regularly conducting assessments is the right move to track the overall progress and growth of the academic learning of students. However, some students may not be able to adjust to this method of assessment. Nevertheless, in future, a hybrid evaluation system may serve the needs of educators and students effectively.