The current trend in education is to move away from traditional exams and instead have a continuous assessment over the school year. What do you think of this trend?
The present approach of imparting literary talents is evolving away from examinations and towards regular assessments. This approach of assessing students’ academic achievement, in my opinion, has several faults.
To begin, the learning periods or spans in the continuous assessment method are far too short. For example, the semester system is used in the majority of colleges and institutions in English-speaking nations. Students are required to master the skills and ideas and apply them in their exams throughout the course of twelve weeks. It’s important to remember that not everyone learns at a rapid rate. Certain pupils will struggle to balance study and application at the same time. Thus, this grading system will benefit those pupils who are quick learners and diligent workers. Procrastinating students may not be the true beneficiaries of this novel evaluation approach.
On the other hand, there are some advantages to the continuous assessment evaluation approach. Regular exams enable instructors to monitor students’ development and, if a student demonstrates weakness or lags behind, they can devise some individualised remedies for that kid. This is far superior to waiting an entire year for term-end examinations. Additionally, students will be less worried in the days leading up to the exam if they have already learned and comprehended ideas through continual evaluation.
To sum up, the strategy of performing assessments on a regular basis is the correct one for tracking pupils’ overall academic achievement and growth. However, some pupils may struggle to acclimate to this assessment style. However, in the future, a hybrid evaluation system may efficiently satisfy the demands of instructors and students.