Continuous assessment may be better than final exams

The current trend in education is to move away from traditional exams and instead have a continuous assessment over the school year. What do you think of this trend?

Sample Solution

The present approach to imparting literary talents is evolving away from examinations and toward regular assessments. This approach to assessing students’ academic achievement, in my opinion, has several faults.

To begin, the learning periods or spans in the continuous assessment method are far too short. For example, the semester system is used in most colleges and institutions in English-speaking nations. Students are required to master the skills and ideas and apply them in their exams over twelve weeks. It’s important to remember that not everyone learns at a rapid rate. Certain pupils will struggle to balance study and application at the same time. Thus, this grading system will benefit those pupils who are quick learners and diligent workers. Procrastinating students may not be the true beneficiaries of this novel evaluation approach.

On the other hand, there are some advantages to the continuous assessment evaluation approach. Regular exams enable instructors to monitor students’ development, and if a student demonstrates weakness or lags behind, they can devise some individualised remedies for that kid. This is far superior to waiting an entire year for term-end examinations. Additionally, students will be less worried in the days leading up to the exam if they have already learned and comprehended ideas through continual evaluation.

To sum up, the strategy of performing assessments on a regular basis is the correct one for tracking pupils’ overall academic achievement and growth. However, some pupils may struggle to acclimate to this assessment style. However, in the future, a hybrid evaluation system may efficiently satisfy the demands of instructors and students.

Sample Solution (Version 2)

Today’s education system is more focused on assessing on a daily basis throughout the year, as opposed to collecting paper tests only once a year as in the past. I agree with the new trend in the education system since it is an approach that emphasises student engagement and concentration.

To begin with, the new school system is more active than the conventional method, which is more advantageous for pupils. This entails engaging undergraduates frequently in diverse study areas and then assessing their comprehension of these topics. If a student is unable to grasp the material, the instructor will discover this through student performance. Thus, it is beneficial for professors to know how their students are performing in their classes; a lecturer could employ a different teaching style for students who perform poorly on evaluations. The schools that followed the strategy, for example, have seen vastly greater improvements in their junior students than those still employing traditional approaches. Therefore, this trend is incredibly beneficial for both students and teachers.

Second, the newly established trend helps students remain more concentrated on their schoolwork. When there are daily tests, students prepare for them, which helps them remain focused on their academics. This access improves their grades; they are more likely to finish the term with high scores. Recent research has shown, for instance, that students who study regularly have a decent probability of earning high grades. Therefore, this exercise keeps the student on track.

In conclusion, a contemporary teaching method is more effective than the institution’s current method. While the new trend requires more time, it is more effective and advantageous. It assists the graduate in being more engaged and concentrated in their studies. Therefore, every school should implement this policy.